On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Pavitra wrote: > On Friday 24 October 2008 11:29:50 am Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I don't mind a weekly proposal, but completing eir monthly reports >> is dependent on voters wanting their rules to rhyme? Not an office >> I'd personally take. > I assume that if voters don't want their rules to rhyme then this > proposal won't pass. Also, line 11 protects the Poet Laureate from > litigation if eir proposals fail.
Forcing a new nomination monthly isn't protection. I'd just take out the "required to have a proposal pass monthly as a monthly report." Requiring weekly proposals are fine, a certain number of them passing over time making a win condition, fine, but not requiring monthly nominations for failure to adopt, especially as the pool of bards is fairly small- if a poet isn't good, someone can just start a nomination anyway. -G.
