On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submit the following proposal, Partner Responsibility, AI-2: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Amend Rule 2145 by appending the following text: > > If a judge finds a partnership guilty in a criminal proceedings, > e may sentence one or more members of the partnership for the > crime rather than the partnership itself. To be an appropriate > sentence in this case, the judge SHOULD use the text of the > partnership as a guide to the devolution of sentencing but > is not bound to follow the text if it is unclear on the subject > or would not adequately apply responsibility. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ew... why not just have TITE not apply to partnerships?
