On Oct 5, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Saturday 04 October 2008 10:13:57 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On behalf of The Law-abiding Partnership:
{
The Law-abiding Partnership registers.
The Law-abiding Partnership claims, to Agora, that it is the
ambassador. }
An obvious breach of the contract, which we seem to have no means
of enforcing.
If it doesn't enforce itself, it is not a partnership. The rule
doesn't say that the partnership test is "claim to devolve
responsibilities and fail" it says "devolve responsibilities".
As a recordkeepor I will not include this partnership as a person
until it proves that it does devolve responsibilities.
It requires its parties to ensure that it obeys the rules. Back before
Take It To Equity, the partners could be prosecuted for the
partnership's rule breaches.
I still thing TITE was a bad idea.
You've got a certain logic there. It seems to me that enforcing a
contract or partnership amongst or on its signatories would be
equity, and enforcing the rules on the contract / partnership would
be a criminal CFJ with the signatories collectively responsible for
the contract / partnership.
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
