On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> On behalf of The Law-abiding Partnership:
>>> {
>>> The Law-abiding Partnership registers.
>>> The Law-abiding Partnership claims, to Agora, that it is the ambassador.
>>> }
>>>
>> An obvious breach of the contract, which we seem to have no means of
>> enforcing.
>
> If it doesn't enforce itself, it is not a partnership. The rule
> doesn't say that the partnership test is "claim to devolve responsibilities
> and fail" it says "devolve responsibilities".
It doesn't enforce itself any less than any other partnership. If
this doesn't lead to an equity case, it's the partners that are at
fault, not the partnership.
-root
