On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> root: >>> False dilemma. It's also possible that your interpretation is wrong, >>> in which case the proposal fails. >> At least two people came up with that interpretation in good faith. It >> certainly isn't unambiguously wrong. > > It's possible to misunderstand something without it being ambiguous.
FWIW I interpreted BobTHJ's ticket the same way ais523 and BobTHJ did (before the controversy, I was counting votes) without a second thought. I didn't notice/pay attention to root's, after the fact its intent is completely ambiguous to me (although it's an unfair comparison; I'm forming the impression after knowing the nature of the controversy). -Goethe
