Goethe: > In this case of disagreement between parties (root vs. ais523) then you have > to > go to strict impartial logical interpretation etc.
I thought you were a fan of equity? Besides, this is a case where a dispute in the meaning of a contract affects something that should be determined entirely by the rules. As a completely different argument, it's arguable that a vote of SELL can work simply because the resulting tickets don't specify an action and thus aren't actually sell tickets, by the definition of sell tickets. This would lead to a vote to endorse the filler of a non-existent ticket, or voting the default in the case that the ticket is not filled. As the ticket does not exist, it cannot be filled, yet it cannot be in an unfilled state either, so neither vote ever happens. -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
