On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One thought: if one is really worried about a stalemate being set up >> (e.g. constant vetoing or whatever) one limit might be "same person can't >> hold same prerogative twice in a row". Though I personally think that's >> over-cautious. -G. > > We might also just reduce the power of the veto. As I recall, it > wasn't always so absolute.
I don't think making it AI-2 is that absolute. Still, it used to just raise quorum to N+1 where N is # of players, that way rubberstamp would reverse it, which is More Interesting if those powers are held by different people. -G.
