On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: >> prerogative (still randomly selected, however)? > > Why on earth does it need to be random? Veto, Rubberstamp, justice > position, and vacant-office holding used to belong to the Speaker > *wholly* as a set of powers and wasn't really scammed in my memory, so > surely spreading those powers is *less* dangerous even if the Speaker > has discretion over assignments?
True. If the Speaker has full power over the assignment, then winning becomes a game of politics. I like it. Proposal coming up shortly. -root
