On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, comex wrote: >> There is no real way to >> compel/force anyone to do anything, without their having agreed to a >> contract to that effect, and there never has been. > > Not true. At least, depending on how the R101 case turns out, not necessarily > true. If equity settlements can be imposed in general, we've also found that > contracts can allow one person to act on behalf of another. An equity case > can include: > > "If Party A fails to act as this equity settlement states, the > judge can act on Party A's behalf to do so." > > I've been planning to use this method for future enforcement, I don't know > if anyone else has thought of it but it seems pretty straightforward.
Well, yeah, I discounted that, because I have yet to see a persuasive argument to the effect that I couldn't just refuse such an equation.
