On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only instances involving the AFO were subject to "out-of-court" > settlements before a precedent was set.
By the way, I think the AFO clearly does devolve its obligations onto its members, but in such a way that, since the passage of "Take it to Equity", the members are simply in violation of the contract if they don't cause the AFO to obey the rules of Agora to the maximum possible extent, and it's impossible to punish them for such violations. It seems to me that the wording of the contract is sufficient to make the AFO a person, but not sufficient to actually compel members to do anything.
