On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The only instances involving the AFO were subject to "out-of-court" >> settlements before a precedent was set. > > By the way, I think the AFO clearly does devolve its obligations onto > its members, but in such a way that, since the passage of "Take it to > Equity", the members are simply in violation of the contract if they > don't cause the AFO to obey the rules of Agora to the maximum possible > extent, and it's impossible to punish them for such violations. It > seems to me that the wording of the contract is sufficient to make the > AFO a person, but not sufficient to actually compel members to do > anything.
But its not enforceable because only members can bring a case forward that they're in violation, that's the whole thing my proto was trying to add (granting Standing to non-parties in this specific type of situation). Also (side note), I'd argue that if a member can't be compelled to do anything, then there's no devolution of responsibilities. -Goethe
