Roger Hicks wrote: >I would exclude any assets from destruction which are part of a >zero-sum system (none at the moment as far as I am aware, but just in >case). Also, I think it needs to be "CAN and SHALL" instead of SHALL >to override contracts which don't permit the voluntary destruction of >their assets.
I think there should not be any extra capability here. If a contract doesn't allow voluntary destruction then this should not be a valid subject for a fine. Don't break zero-sum currencies, and in general don't break how particular currencies are designed. You could allow fining by transferring currency to the L&FD in lieu of destruction. That would make more currencies available for fines. -zefram
