On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would exclude any assets from destruction which are part of a > zero-sum system (none at the moment as far as I am aware, but just in > case).
Yes, I agree that it should only be able to apply to contracts that allow it, or that do not disallow it. > Also, I think it needs to be "CAN and SHALL" instead of SHALL > to override contracts which don't permit the voluntary destruction of > their assets. Such a contract most likely should not allow its assets to be fined anyway. -root
