On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 8 July 2008 2:12:57 Zefram wrote: >> I think there should not be any extra capability here. If a contract >> doesn't allow voluntary destruction then this should not be a valid >> subject for a fine. Don't break zero-sum currencies, and in general >> don't break how particular currencies are designed. >> >> You could allow fining by transferring currency to the L&FD in lieu >> of destruction. That would make more currencies available for fines. > > L&FD transfer usually breaks the same things as outright destruction. > If the Lost & Found Department gets 3 VP, for example, they're as good > as gone. >
Why not allow the Assessor to auction off anything in the L&FD? BobTHJ
