On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would exclude any assets from destruction which are part of a >> zero-sum system (none at the moment as far as I am aware, but just in >> case). > > Yes, I agree that it should only be able to apply to contracts that > allow it, or that do not disallow it. > >> Also, I think it needs to be "CAN and SHALL" instead of SHALL >> to override contracts which don't permit the voluntary destruction of >> their assets. > > Such a contract most likely should not allow its assets to be fined anyway. > Transferring the FINED assets to the Lost & Found Dept is reasonable and would permit any contract to be fined.
BobTHJ
