On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * FINE in a specified currency whose backing document specifies
>> a FINE amount, appropriate for rule breaches of small consequence.
>> When in effect, the ninny SHALL within 72 hours destroy the
>> amount of the specified currency equalling the FINE amount in that
>> currency's backing document. The ninny is only obliged to perform one
>> destruction per question on sentencing, even if sentences of
>> this type are assigned more than once or go into effect more
>> than once.
>
> Having the backing document specify the amount still seems relatively
> inflexible. Why not allow the judge to specify the amount as well?
>
> -root
>
Can the judge really be trusted to specify an arbitrary amount?
