On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>      - the statement of the CFJ's truth depends on an unknown state
>        within a contract

Preventing contract escalation into gamestate ambiguity is better than
allowing them and just preventing wins based on them.

>      Each such winner
>      SHALL also submit a proposal that causes all such tortoises to
>      become Boring.

Hmm... how would this work?  The ambiguity in the gamestate may well
be fixed during the two week period before the winner wins, but even
that wouldn't cause the tortoise to become Boring, it would just cause
future similar CFJs to not be tortoises at all (because UNDECIDABLE
would not be an appropriate judgement).

Reply via email to