There seems to have been quite a bit of paradox theft recently,
so I've come up with this to try to clamp down on it.
Proto: Boring Paradoxes (AI=3, II=1)
{{{{
Amend rule 2110 to the following:
{{{
A tortoise is an inquiry case for which the question of veracity
is UNDECIDABLE.
A tortoise is Boring if and only if at least one of the
following conditions holds:
- it is not about the possibility or legality of a rule-defined
action (actual or hypothetical)
- it is about a situation that occured before the case was
filed (i.e. not arising from the case itself, and not occuring
after the initiation of that case)
- it was about an action that retroactively caused itself to
have been illegal
- the statement of the CFJ's truth depends on an unknown state
within a contract
Upon a win announcement that a tortoise has continuously been a
non-Boring tortoise for no greater than four and no less than
two weeks, the initiator satisfies the Winning Condition of
Paradox.
Cleanup procedure: Each winner satisfying this Winning
Condition SHALL, as soon as possible, make a reasonable attempt
to resolve the paradox. The same person can not satisfy this
Winning Condition again for the same tortoise or for any other
tortoise that was linked to it in assignment. Each such winner
SHALL also submit a proposal that causes all such tortoises to
become Boring.
}}}
}}}}
