On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >> IIRC, the URL was posted without comment. Had you explicitly said "I >> take the actions available at <URL>", it would probably be effective >> (but frowned upon (but someone would probably end up posting a suitable >> plaintext summary to the list)). > > As a judge, I personally wouldn't allow it without some proof that > the URL contents were outside the technical domain of control of the > sender (though a posted transcription might be a compromise if there > was no debate on content and at least one witness reasonably close to > the time of announcement). -Goethe > What's to prevent someone from posting a URL that displays different text to different players?
BobTHJ
