On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > Poll: How would you prefer your large messages: in multiple parts, or as a > URL?
Weren't URL's judged against in your object/I support picture? Anyway, don't worry about message length, worry about number of actions some poor recordkeepor has to note or make. Maybe, a kindness would be to make a pseudo-report of "this is the state of these records at the end of my scam if the scam worked." I did two scams by large emails. In one I drained the deck of cards like you drained the bank: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2004-May/002849.html but I was the recordkeepor and in fact the scam tested (and was found when I was creating) my automation methods. The other one was a failure: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2005-April/003985.html but only required the action of the promotor at distributing one very very long proposal. -Goethe
