On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > IIRC, the URL was posted without comment. Had you explicitly said "I > take the actions available at <URL>", it would probably be effective > (but frowned upon (but someone would probably end up posting a suitable > plaintext summary to the list)).
As a judge, I personally wouldn't allow it without some proof that the URL contents were outside the technical domain of control of the sender (though a posted transcription might be a compromise if there was no debate on content and at least one witness reasonably close to the time of announcement). -Goethe
