On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and as far as I > could tell, it would be inequitable to judge anything but what the parties > wanted.
If all of the parties agree to a resolution, the equity court isn't needed. I don't think this interpretation is a good one, but if it is, the obvious fix to this bug in the rules is to just get rid of equity cases altogether, as they'd have no purpose. All they're allowed to do is create contracts that the parties could create themselves, and if the only appropriate contracts for them to create are those the parties *want* to create themselves they should just do it.
