ais523 wrote: > NttDF? (What happens if you send a proto to a-b, anyway?)
On top of strong game custom, it fails to meet Rule 106's "clear indication" requirement. > as far as I could tell, it would be inequitable to judge anything but > what the parties wanted. [snip] > What would other players have done if that CFJ had instead have been > assigned to them rather than me, and root had made the same offer? I > suppose this proto of Murphy's would allow them to now turn down the > offer without breaking the rules. I disagree with your first stance, but given that you accept it, it does lead to your second stance. One could argue "all judgements are inappropriate, I deliver equity-with-gravy and plead EXCUSED", but this shouldn't hold water because the rule declaring it inappropriate has higher power (2 vs 1.7).
