I applaud you fort this message Goethe. It was fun to read. On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 May 2008, Taral wrote: > > On 5/13/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> from top to bottom. > >> top is no more difficult to read than one that can be read consistently > >> A message that can be read consistently from bottom to > > > > Considering how long it took me to read your message, I must > > respectfully disagree on this point. > > ehteoG- > too many though. It's certainly not the easiest thing to type. > gniht eno eb yam pot ot mottob eht gniddA .secitcarp eno sa daer > surprisingly easy to get used to, and (more to the point) faster to > dna tnetsisnoc saw tfel ot thgir enil txen eht neht thgir ot tfel > that reading lines that alternated in the fashion of first one being > (siht daer I erehw tegrof I) desoporp ylsuoires saw ti taht rebmemer I > One can be trained to read smoothly in a varity of forms, after all; > .llew ytterp wolf ot sdnet ti neht dna desu dohtem eht ot sa thgisni > Actually, I didn't find it so hard. One simply must have a momentary > > > >
-- -----Iammars www.jmcteague.com
