-zefram I generally presume that there can't be anything worthwhile in it. tends to be included all the time (from those people who send it at all), suggests that it repeats some of the actual message content. Since it content-type application/ms-tnef. Examining the file with a text viewer What's in it? I see many messages that have a file by this name, and the
>winmail.dat is evil. to give context to the specific remarks being made. monolithic block, have failed to learn the purpose of reply quotation: at the archive. Those who quote unselectively, and who quote in a in my mailbox, following the In-Reply-To/References chain. Or look If I want to see the previous message in all its glory, I can look Yes. In this aspect, bottom-posting is just as bad as top-posting. >Quoting the entire message is evil. from top to bottom. top is no more difficult to read than one that can be read consistently bottom-to-top. A message that can be read consistently from bottom to read top-to-bottom, but the segments must be taken in the opposite order, top-posting. The problem is that each segment of the message must be Top-posting isn't the problem. The problem is *inconsistent* >Top-posting is evil. Taral wrote:
