On Tue, 13 May 2008, Taral wrote:
> On 5/13/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> from top to bottom.
>> top is no more difficult to read than one that can be read consistently
>> A message that can be read consistently from bottom to
>
> Considering how long it took me to read your message, I must
> respectfully disagree on this point.
ehteoG-
too many though. It's certainly not the easiest thing to type.
gniht eno eb yam pot ot mottob eht gniddA .secitcarp eno sa daer
surprisingly easy to get used to, and (more to the point) faster to
dna tnetsisnoc saw tfel ot thgir enil txen eht neht thgir ot tfel
that reading lines that alternated in the fashion of first one being
(siht daer I erehw tegrof I) desoporp ylsuoires saw ti taht rebmemer I
One can be trained to read smoothly in a varity of forms, after all;
.llew ytterp wolf ot sdnet ti neht dna desu dohtem eht ot sa thgisni
Actually, I didn't find it so hard. One simply must have a momentary
