On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Individual actions /are/ significant, whether or not they are entered > into the database individually or not. See CFJ 1908.
I submit that if comex and woggle had at some point indicated that they had silently agreed to Wooble's attempted judgement in that case, then the appropriate judgement in CFJ 1908 would have been TRUE, not FALSE. Ensuring that the panel has agreement -- either unanimous or majority -- before acting is the responsibility of the panel members themselves, not the rest of us. > > More confusing than having to inspect the entire case history in order > > to determine what panels exist? > > No, but the proposed revision would eliminate both. I'm not sure what revision you're referring to. I've only seen the original version of the proto. -root
