Ed Murphy wrote: >Proto-Proposal: Per-case panels Messy. It's a lot of extra complexity and room for bugs. It doesn't interface properly with the rest of the judicial system, as evidenced by your need to increase the power of R911 so that it can make exceptions to the framework rules.
The rationale of bending reality to match your outdated automation is appalling. We have a cleanly-engineered judicial system, which was brought in to do away with the former system's cruft, such as the complex and sui generis appeal board assignments. You propose to undo this progress, when you should instead be redeveloping your database to reflect the new structure. -zefram
