On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:36 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Assuming you're referring to what I quoted... I don't think being > "transferred to a state of being owned by" and entity is a reasonable > interpretation of an asset being "transferred to" it. The latter (as > evidenced by its wording and by the later statements of R2166 > involving transfers) implies that the "sender" and "receiver" are > entities.
I would go further and argue that the verb "transfer" is not even apt for the former usage. "Transition" would be much more appropriate. -root