On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > In the interest of preserving the intent of the rule (and I should > know, I wrote it),
I have no opinion on the rest of the CFJ, but I have to call you out here: you wrote it with one intent, but voters read it and may have voted it in with another/misunderstood/different intent, which is why Original Intent is a poor doctrine to go by in a legislative setting. -Goethe
