On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > comex wrote: > > > On 3/17/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is it reasonable to interpret assets as being transferred from a > >> state of being unowned to a state of being owned by <entity>? > > > > Yes, but it is unreasonable to interpret objects as being transferred > > from the ownership of <null> to the ownership of <entity>. > > This is a silly viewpoint. Assets are not a database; there is no such > thing as "ownership of <null>".
Exactly. So how can something be transferred from it? -root
