On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > Or rather I should ask, how is the meaning ambiguous in a way that did > not apply equally in the case considered in CFJ 1894? No more free judgement For Affirm or Reassign My opinion waits
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Taral
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Charles Reiss
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 1903a Ben Caplan