On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Charles Reiss wrote:
> If Wooble or comex writes a concurring opinion that arguably
> acknowledges Goethe's argument on appeal, I consent to the panel
> judging AFFIRM and publishing that concurring opinion.
No REMAND? But...but... I read the I Ching in anticipation! And it
gave the right answer (really).
El Cheapo concurring opinion, use if you really must:
Not every question is a CFJ, any more than every statement ever made
in Agora Business is a CFJ. A specific directive is needed: eg "I call
for judgement on the following question:" This directive is explicitly
external to the statement itself. For example, to call CFJ 1676, comex
used the following (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
' I call for judgement on the statement "this is a CFJ" '
-Goethe
