On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Cheapo concurring opinion, use if you really must: > > Not every question is a CFJ, any more than every statement ever made > in Agora Business is a CFJ. A specific directive is needed: eg "I call > for judgement on the following question:" This directive is explicitly > external to the statement itself. For example, to call CFJ 1676, comex > used the following (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ' I call for judgement on the statement "this is a CFJ" '
This ignores the precedent of CFJ 1894, which established the general equivalence of questions and statements. -root
