On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Wooble or comex writes a concurring opinion that arguably > acknowledges Goethe's argument on appeal, I consent to the panel > judging AFFIRM and publishing that concurring opinion.
Concurring opinion: I think this is a good bit of prose and uses the word 'impeccable': > I support Murphy's call for appeal of CFJ 1903. In spite of reading this > in the caller's arguments, I looked at the ruleset that contained R591/23, > not the recently passed R591/24 (which contains the above clause), and this > clause calls into question my otherwise impeccable reasoning. (whether my concurring opinion acknowledges the argument is arguable I think)
