On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  There's an older form of "appeal by proposal", used in the 1994 era,
>  which involved proposals along the lines of "The judgement in CFJ 123
>  is hereby changed to TRUE.".

It seems to me that if such a proposal were to happen today, the Win
by Paradox rule should account for it.  That suggests an improved
wording.  Resubmission coming up.

-root

Reply via email to