root wrote: >> Upon a win announcement that a paradox case has been judged >> UNDECIDABLE, and that the time limit for appealing that judgement >> has expired without an appeal within the past two weeks, the >> initiator satisfies the Winning Condition of Paradox. >> >> Fortunately, inquiry cases only have one such time limit; a general >> definition of "judicial finding" would have to specify the time limit(s) >> with the most recent deadline. > > I considered a similar wording, but it occurred to me that there is no > time limit for appeal by proposal, and I didn't want to leave it open > to that sort of interpretation. Specifying a particular range seemed > the safest approach. Of course, the actual time limit for appeals > could change in the future, but it doesn't really matter if this rule > doesn't quite track.
AFAIK there's no precedent for literal appeal by proposal, i.e. "upon the adoption of this proposal, an appeal of CFJ 2000 is initiated"; proposals generally just affirm or overturn a precedent by explicitly legislating one way or the other.
