On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See this? /This/ is why I tried to generalize the definition > of "judicial finding".
Of course, this wouldn't have been a problem had you waited for it to pass before using the definition in your separate win refactor proposal. ;-) > Hmm, how about: > > Upon a win announcement that a paradox case has been judged > UNDECIDABLE, and that the time limit for appealing that judgement > has expired without an appeal within the past two weeks, the > initiator satisfies the Winning Condition of Paradox. > > Fortunately, inquiry cases only have one such time limit; a general > definition of "judicial finding" would have to specify the time limit(s) > with the most recent deadline. I considered a similar wording, but it occurred to me that there is no time limit for appeal by proposal, and I didn't want to leave it open to that sort of interpretation. Specifying a particular range seemed the safest approach. Of course, the actual time limit for appeals could change in the future, but it doesn't really matter if this rule doesn't quite track. -root
