Ed Murphy wrote: >AFAIK there's no precedent for literal appeal by proposal, i.e. "upon >the adoption of this proposal, an appeal of CFJ 2000 is initiated"; >proposals generally just affirm or overturn a precedent by explicitly >legislating one way or the other.
There's an older form of "appeal by proposal", used in the 1994 era, which involved proposals along the lines of "The judgement in CFJ 123 is hereby changed to TRUE.". -zefram
