On Dec 3, 2007 10:54 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So you're saying that Fookiemyartug could not have contained that text >> at the time CFJ 1799 was called? In that case, I move to SUSTAIN in >> 1799a and OVERTURN with FALSE in 1805a.
root, you've already got (pre) approval to do this from Murphy and me. -Goethe
