On Nov 15, 2007 2:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > > But they could have simply objected to the contest creation in the first > > place. > > You neglect non-contestant scams. E.g., it seems like a good fair contest > so no-one protests, then a month later "hey, e's about to win with the > next [fairly won] points award. Let's conspire to end the contest!" > > > Do we need a 4-day delay for decontestation? > > Yes, for just the above reason. > > > Perhaps if the contract changes, the contest > > should cease to be a contest until it has been through the objection > > mechanism once again. > > You're right. I'll add something like this. > Requiring Agoran Consent to disband a contest is far simpler. The above is biased against any rapidly changing contest.
BobTHJ
