On Nov 16, 2007 2:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I looked back at old Points Contest rules while drafting this. Before, > we basically limited scams by saying basing points awards on # of players, > and making incremental awards small enough that a pure "I award points > to you" scam just got you 5% of the way to a win per week, so creeping > and boring. The main problem now is the multiplication through > partnerships/second-class persons...it should be prevented while allowing > for the possibility of a "team" joining or running a legitimate game.
I agree. You've already protoed fixes for that which don't rely on contest approval; I think we should just use those. -root
