On 11/15/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our past versions of contests worked best when they depended solely on a > contestmaster for continuity. But also, this is a philosophical difference > between us, I suspect. While we needed non-Agoran contract definitions to > bootstrap partnerships, and we still need them for the partnership->person > link perhaps, we do not need to be so strict for non-partnership contracts.
I think that the whole contract-doesn't-exist-until-someone-agrees-to-it mechanism is kind of messy...
