On Nov 14, 2007 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Roger Hicks wrote: > > Why first-class? This prevents contests run by a partnership (thus > > sharing the responsibilities of running the contest). The rest of it I > > like. > > Using the "basis" for membership points calculations prevents scammers > from raising the points available to an individual contest by 2^N, but > it doesn't prevent making 2^N contestmasters and therefore contests. > But yes, I would like to allow "legitimate" partnerships to run contests. > Thoughts on a sufficient limitation against abuses? Is the objection > mechanism enough?
How about requiring the basis of the contestmaster to be disjoint from the bases of the contestmasters of all other contests? -root
