On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Therefore, I intend to cause the panel to judge AFFIRM on the appeal > > > of CFJ 1711. > > > > I will agree to this judgement if BobTHJ does, although as I stated in > > my own analysis, I would prefer a judgement of REMAND. > > > > -root > > > I intend to cause the panel to recuse itself. > > Why? Because I can.
This might be considered a violation of Rule 2157, wrt the R2158 requirement to assign a judgement ASAP. -root
