Ian Kelly wrote:
On 8/27/07, Levi Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Kelly wrote:
On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Therefore, I intend to cause the panel to judge AFFIRM on the appeal
of CFJ 1711.
I also intend to cause the panel to register.
Panels are not persons and so cannot register. I considered the same
thing a couple weeks ago. :-)
-root
Why doesn't a panel qualify as a partnership under Rule 2145?
It seems close to meeting the requirements on a quick reading of 2145 and 2157.
Because it's not an agreement?
-root
That's the only problem I saw also. Could a judicial panel be interpreted as a
binding agreement betweeen three players to judge a judicial case?
Does it depend on how you'd define binding agreement?
Levi
