On 8/27/07, Levi Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ian Kelly wrote: > > On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Therefore, I intend to cause the panel to judge AFFIRM on the appeal > >>> of CFJ 1711. > >>> > >> I also intend to cause the panel to register. > > > > Panels are not persons and so cannot register. I considered the same > > thing a couple weeks ago. :-) > > > > -root > > Why doesn't a panel qualify as a partnership under Rule 2145? > > It seems close to meeting the requirements on a quick reading of 2145 and > 2157.
Because it's not an agreement? -root
