Zefram wrote: > I think the interpretation of R101 was that its use of "invoke" has a > meaning independent of the actual judicial rules, so it doesn't need to > be changed due to that.
That was my (caller's) argument, but IIRC Judge Maud rejected it, which is why it needs fixing. You could do it at lower power by defining "invoke" to be something like "to invoke judgement is to call judgement with the expectation that justice will be served in reasonable time." -G.
