Ed Murphy wrote: > "Unproven" carries connotations of Godelian >incompleteness,
That would be "unprovable". > or perhaps "the preponderance of the evidence points >to TRUE but it's not beyond a reasonable doubt". One can prove a case in either direction. I intended "unproven" to be interpreted in this neutral manner. "Unrefuted", which you mention, is definitely one-sided, however. How about "UNDETERMINED"? -zefram
