On 6/20/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frankly, it's far more of an abuse that a single natural player can accumulate 13x (or arbitrarily more) base voting power on something through free submission of trivial fix proposals. That's more of a chilling effect on voting than partnership VC spending is. The correct system should be an absolute cap, or a progressive cost (Cost of increasing VPOP by one is proportional to VPOP to some power greater than 0).
Yes, that's something else I've been meaning to reform. We had a similar problem when Quazie first registered and started submitting scads of proposals (though in Quazie's case e merely got obscenely wealthy). We fixed the issue then, and it's hard to believe we've fallen back into that trap so soon thereafter. -root
